0ac41730-37ca-11f0-bd93-f377d3100e8eJamaica Long Pond Distilia
Distilia Long Pond Jamaican Rum (Horses) 1983 70cl bottle
Long Pond · Jamaica · 52,5%

Distilia Long Pond Jamaican Rum (Horses) 1983

9.3/10 20 community reviews ↓
Loved by Skyfly , TheJona'Spirits & 18 more

For seasoned enthusiasts only: a 38‑year Long Pond that balances soft Jamaican esters with tropical fruits, light smoke and refined oak. RumX members praise its endless finish and benchmark-level complexity for slow sipping.

  • World-class complexity
  • Tropical fruit focus
  • Endless finish
Currently no offers for delivery to Germany.
RumX is featured in Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Details about Distilia Long Pond Jamaican Rum (Horses) 1983

CountryJamaica
DistilleryLong Pond
BottlerDistilia
CategoryPot Still Rum
ABV52,5%
Volume70cl
Age38 years
Vintage1983
Bottled2022
Cask no.#8
Limited edition108 bottles

Embed this rum on your blog Create widget →

How does Distilia Long Pond Jamaican Rum (Horses) 1983 taste?

Aggregated from 20 community reviews.

Benchmark 38‑year Long Pond funk elegance For seasoned enthusiasts only: a 38‑year Long Pond that balances soft Jamaican esters with tropical fruits, light smoke and refined oak. RumX members praise its endless finish and benchmark-level complexity for slow sipping.

Perfect for

Seasoned Jamaican fans who love elegant, fruity Long Pond with gentle funk, light smoke and deep, mature oak at a serious cask-driven level.

Less suitable for

Beginners, those sensitive to higher ABV or smoky notes, and anyone unwilling to pay premium prices for very old single-cask rum.

How is Distilia Long Pond Jamaican Rum (Horses) 1983 rated?

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict , 9.3 lands squarely in the "Excellent" band. 100% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 0% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →

0–1
1–2
2–3
3–4
4–5
5–6
6–7
7–8
8–9
9–10

Rum reviews

A selection of the most popular reviews from our community. You can view the complete list in our app.

Based on 20 ratings

Review by Skyfly

Skyfly Top voice
Oct 2025459 reviewsGermany
9.4/10

At this price, it should offer something, and it does! From nose to finish, tropical and dried fruits harmonize excellently with each other. The cask is perfectly integrated so that wood is noticeable, but only very subtly. The wood is accompanied by spices, allspice, nuts and a little chocolate; in varying degrees from nose to finish. The sweetness is provided by a pleasant caramel note, which tastes like crème brulee on the palate. Great cinema!

Review by TheJona'Spirits

Feb 2026198 reviewsFrance
9.3/10

👃 A nose dominated above all by sweet esters magnified by time. The deliciousness of honeycomb, vanilla pastry cream, flambéed and candied pineapple brioche, crystallized honey. Then, aromas escape from a basket of tropical fruits dominated by Victoria pineapple, ripe banana, mango, and papaya. Subtly spicy and vanilla woodiness, hardwood furniture polish, varnish & light solvents, dry tobacco smoke, and dusty furniture. Balance, finesse, and elegance characterize this nose. 😋 Esters, of course, sweet but sufficiently funky. Tropical fruits cut into small cubes, caramelized with butter in a pan. Flavors as creamy as ever, with roasted almond pastries. Mild spices on exotic peppers, a little Espelette pepper, pink peppercorns, dried vanilla, candle wax. Then, the finish becomes herbaceous, almost peaty, with meaty notes, dried and salted meat, very dry tobacco. A complex, evolving palate with a surprising finish. ⛳ Long, warm, comforting, pleasantly drying. Dried pineapple, a hint of candied sugar cane, spices, long tobacco leaves, a touch of saddle leather. 🏆 A very old Jamaican rum, sublime from start to finish. Elegance, great complexity, a subtle blend of controlled sweet esters, candied rather than overripe fruit, delicacies and slightly peaty and meaty notes that add even more depth. It's a shame the price is so high.

Review by Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰

Dec 20255,487 reviewsDenmark
9.4/10

#6149 28.12.2025 Last online tasting if the year with the guys. It's been a great year, probably one if the craziest one's ever 🥰 Met many new run friends both online and in person, travelled a lot Germany, Belgium, France and Sweden. Next year should be a bit more tranquil I hope, because I have a ton of samples 🙃 Nose Fresh, medium intense, light wood, fruity, overripe, banana, light marzipan, earthy, light herbs. Palate Oily, wood, fruity, overripe, cinnamon, medium spicy, light marzipan, light nutts, faint tannins. Finish Very long and warm, wood, faint tannins, medium dry, fruity, light citrus, banana. Empty glass Citrus, light chocolate, faint caramel, light nutts, cinnamon.

Review by Johannes

Nov 20252,781 reviewsGermany
9.2/10

Fruchtiger Beginn mit leichten Estern von Hampden und einer Würzigkeit von Long Pond, etwas dünn, aber rund, im Verlauf mehr Marzipan, im Abgang leichte torfige/rauchige Noten. Erinnert mich etwas an den Long Pond 1941 mit weniger Kräutern. Großartig!

Review by Julien Ries

Julien Ries
Jan 2026109 reviewsFrance
9.3/10

Le nez apporte des esters assez doux, avec un jus de fruits exotiques bien mûrs (mangue, passion, ananas) mais pas pourris ou fermentés comme on pourrait retrouver dans des Jamaicains plus funky. Le boisé est présent mais étonnamment, il ne marque pas trop le jus malgré son grand âge. Quelques épices douces passent pas là (poivre de Sichuan). La bouche met une claque par son côté extrêmement fumé, de viande rôtie en boucané. C'est très surprenant comparé au nez. Le tabac bien séché envahit les papilles aussi, avec pas mal de piquant (piment de Jamaïque). Toutefois, le tout est maîtrisé, contrôlé, moins foufou qu'un Hampden. La finale, interminable, apporte le réconfort de l'ananas, du rôti et du tabac, mais sans hanter le palais au point de l'écoeurement comme ça peut arriver chez les rhums à hauts esters.

Review by Leo Krüper

Oct 2025872 reviewsGermany
8.5/10

The rum is relatively shallow for its age. The alcohol is well integrated with a slight sweetness. There is a hint of spiciness at the back. Could be a strange cask with whisky influences. Or the rum is somewhat overblended. The price is abnormal, but understandable given the age.

Review by Jakob

Dec 20251,419 reviewsSwitzerland
9.2/10

Long Pond 1983, die dritte - faszinierend, was Distilia hier für Schätze ausgegraben hat. Das „Horses“-Release wurde am selben Tag wie das Bottling für die Pirates-Serie abgefüllt; entsprechend ist der Rum 38 Jahre alt, da er bereits 2022 aus dem Fass kam. Das Schwesterrelease „Vane“ hatte die Messlatte bereits sehr hoch gelegt uns sorgt bei mir für Vorfreude - vom Sins ganz zu schweigen. Dementsprechend kamen für meine Verkostung auch alle drei Distilia Long Ponds aus 1983 parallel ins Glas. Die Nase des Horses-Releases ist direkt fantastisch, satte Tropenfrüchte, schwere Karamellsüsse, das Alter ist einzig durch die bemerkenswerte Ausgewogenheit erkennbar - grossartig. Am Gaumen ist der Rum etwas knackiger unterwegs als das Ausnahmerelease für die Sins-Serie, letzteres Bottling zieht zwar entlang aller Aromen jeweils nur in Nuancen, aber dennoch eindeutig nochmals in höhere Register, da alles noch einen Ticken komplexer und dennoch vollkommen harmonisch daherkommt. Aber das ist Kritik auf höchstem Niveau - der Horses lässt die Tropenfrüchte ebenfalls toll aufspielen, der Mund wird geflutet von Ananas, Mango, Papaya, Pfirsich, Limette, dazu gesellen sich Karamell, vanilliges Eichenholz sowie leichte Würznoten. Was im Vergleich sowohl zu Sins als auch dem Schwesterrelease „Vane“ auffällt ist eine erdig-torfig anmutende Note im Abgang. Eine Aromatik, die mir schön öfter bei sehr lange gelagerten Rums aufgefallen ist. Einerseits speziell, dass ich diese Aromatik beim Vane nicht finden kann, andererseits aber ein willkommenes Alleinstellungsmerkmal für das Release, das mit seiner Qualität bestens in die Trilogie der vorzüglichen 1983er Long Ponds passt.

Rate

Community purchases

11 bottles logged by 52,000+ RumX members. The ratio of closed / opened / emptied, indicates whether this rum is meant to be drunk or is a collector's item.

3 Closed In collections, sealed
1 Opened Being poured right now
0 Emptied Finished, came back for more
25% Open rate Share that isn't sealed

Also on the wishlist of 15 members.

In the app
Track the market value of each bottle in your collection
Live auction-house prices, retail drops, and RumX community trades, updated daily.
Download app →

About the Long Pond distillery

The Long Pond distillery is located in Jamaica. Rums from Long Pond have been reviewed 6,675 times with an average of 8.5/10.

To Long Pond →

You may also enjoy

Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:

Price alerts · in the RumX app

Don't miss out on any more deals on Distilia Long Pond Jamaican Rum (Horses) 1983.

Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.

★ 4.8/5 on App Store & Play Store
Oliver, founder of RumX Oliver · Founder

By rum lovers, for rum lovers

I'm Oliver, together with Jakob, Robert and Lukas, we started RumX in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.

What began as a digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence, without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.

Oliver, Stuttgart

About RumX →
52,000+ Active tasters
280,000+ Independent reviews
25,000+ Rums catalogued
★ 4.8/5 iOS & Android app
As featured in
Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Rating guide

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict. Here's what each band means.

9.0–10.0 Excellent Stash as many as you can afford. Tell no one.
8.0–8.9 Very good Bank a backup. Tell everyone you meet.
7.0–7.9 Good Buy one and recommend it to your friends.
6.0–6.9 Pleasant Solid, super glad I drank it.
5.0–5.9 Average Totally acceptable.
4.0–4.9 Drinkable Not vocally complaining.
3.0–3.9 Poor Wish I was drinking something else.
2.0–2.9 Very poor Nothing nice to say.
1.0–1.9 Unpleasant No, that's not for me.
0.1–0.9 Inedible Pour it out.