f3a88f70-ff0e-11ef-b6fd-b5a0d6bbd4d7Trinidad T.D.L Spirit of Rum
T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 52 2003 50cl bottle
Bottle
Aromas
Aged rum · 22 years · 53,4%

T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 52 2003

Sipped neat, this 22-year Trinidad TDL pours dense and oily: cherry, peach, mint and menthol over caramel, raisin and roasted-nut chocolate, with a faint tarry, earthy note underneath. The 53.4% is warm but tucked in well. Members split on the sweeter, chocolatey "Spanish" side — some love the balance, purists wanting a mint-menthol bomb find it too rounded.

The community says
  • Well-integrated alcohol
  • Cherry and mint
  • Leans sweet/Spanish
Currently no offers for delivery to Germany.

The look inside the bottle

How does T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 52 2003 taste?

Aggregated from 64 community reviews.

Balanced, cherry-and-mint aged Trinidad sipper Well-liked mature TDL with cherry, mint and soft sweetness over roasted oak. Most call it balanced and easy-sipping; some find it too sweet and under-complex versus other 2003s.

Perfect for

Fans of aged, sweeter-leaning Trinidad TDL with cherry and mint

Less suitable for

Purists chasing a big mint-menthol, dirty TDL bomb

Style & occasion

How the community classifies this rum. Each category takes you to similar rums.

25 of 64 left detailed tasting impressions · Click an aroma to explore similar rums

How is T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 52 2003 rated?

RumX’s 0–10 scale is strict: 8.8 sits in the “Very good” band. 100% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 0% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →

Community voices

What does the community say?

5% rate it between 6 and 8. 20 selected write-ups from 64 community ratings. You can view the complete list in our app.

Review by Gunnar Böhme "Bauerngaumen" 🤓

Gunnar Böhme "Bauerngaumen" 🤓
Mar 2025637 reviewsGermany
8.9/10

At a first tasting, I found the rum to be extremely successful, not only for a February 2003 distillate, but also as a T.D.L overall. Initially, also on the nose, a pleasant, light sweetness, it develops again clearly with longer standing time, it becomes more and more palatable with recognizable T.D.L DNA with perfectly integrated alcohol. Tops the comparable T.D.L from the Wu Dram Clan (RX23227) and scratches the 90-point mark for me.

Review by Mirco

Mirco
Aug 2025558 reviewsSwitzerland
8.9/10

A top representative of the 2003 TDLs, but does not reach the top, the Spirit Gallery 2003 TDL. Round, complex and balanced. Tropical fruit and cherry with a pleasant sweetness. Leather and black tea are subtly perceptible.

Review by cigares

cigares
Mar 2025921 reviewsSwitzerland
8.9/10

Spirits Museum Tasting 29th of March 2025. A beautiful, fruity nose with tropical fruit, berries and black cherry. A hint of dried herbs and a very light mechanical workshop add complexity. On the palate, there's a hint of marzipan and the fruit is still there, black cherry and red berries. The finish is long, balanced and all the aromas diminish in concert. A very fine, complex and delicious rum.

Review by Andi

Andi
Andi
Mar 2025270 reviews
8.9/10

A really pleasant and light sweetness on the nose and palate, paired with fruit and a little wood. A great complexity that is not overwhelming. You can tell it's a TDL, but it doesn't have those blatant minty notes. It's really very subtle. Which makes the rum even more approachable. It's really pleasant to sip. In my opinion, the alcohol is well integrated and doesn't stand out.

Review by mto75

mto75
Apr 2025686 reviewsGermany
8.5/10

There have been some really good TDL 2003s, I would highlight the Spirit Gallery, Single Cask Nation and Excellence Rhum, which all score between 86-87 points for me. The RC comes across on the nose with tropical fruits, caramel, tropical wood, sour cherry, herbal freshness. Passion fruit, caramel, plenty of mint and espresso on the palate. The finish is pleasantly tart (tannins). Not going to be my new 2003 champion, but still a very good bottling!

Review by Christoph

Christoph
Mar 2025444 reviewsGermany
9.1/10

In some places I felt reminded of a 1998 Caroni from Bellamy, only here I'm wavering between cherry and raisin. Where with many other T.D.L.'s you feel like you've been cut through the dirt, here you're first served a strong fruit nose, but woody notes are also present in the nose. In the complex taste, which develops over time, the fruity notes alternate with a little wood and an espresso in between. I also sense a slightly earthy note. It is only in the finish that a little dirt appears, the typical scratching of sand that you get with so many rums from Trinidad. There is also a nice mint note that lingers on the palate.

Review by zabo

zabo
Mar 20251,503 reviewsGermany
8.4/10

In the test WDC, RC Edt.52, Hunter Laing and the one from Spirit Gallery. The differences are clearly recognizable, the WDC and RC are more on the Spanish chocolate side, whereas the SG and HL are the absolute minty alcohol bombs. There's a little too much mint in both for me, which overpowers almost everything. Sorry, it's a little too much for me. But it's a matter of taste, unfortunately not mine. Otherwise they are all good bottlings, although I would put the WDC and RC more in the easy sipping category.

Review by Basti

Basti
Jun 2025496 reviewsGermany
8.2/10

Konnte mich sowohl bei der ersten als auch bei der zweiten Verkostung nicht wirklich überzeugen und landet im direkt Vergleich mit anderen TDL Vertretern aus 2003 eher auf den hinteren Plätzen. Insgesamt sehr spanisch anmutend mit viel Gewürzen, Karamell und Fass. Wenn man die Minze sucht findet man die auch irgendwo im Hintergrund. Aus meiner Sicht minimal "besser" als der WDC, aber die Februar Batches können mich nach wie vor nicht wirklich überzeugen.

Add your rating

Details about T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 52 2003

A rum from Trinidad, bottled by Spirit of Rum, at 53,4%.

CountryTrinidad
DistilleryT.D.L
ABV53,4%
Volume50cl
Age22 years
Vintage2003
Bottled2025
Limited edition228 bottles

Embed this rum on your blog Create widget →

Community purchases

61 bottles logged by 49 collectors.

A drinker & collector.

21% opened, 6 emptied and repurchased.

48 sealed 7 open 6 emptied

What did the community pay for T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 52 2003?

Community paid 107–144 €.

What members actually paid for their bottles. A typical range, not the current shop price. Full price & collection history in RX+ →

61 purchased · 64 tasted · 55 wishlist · as of

About the T.D.L distillery

The T.D.L distillery is located in Trinidad. Rums from T.D.L have been reviewed 8,223 times with an average of 8.3/10.

To T.D.L →

You may also enjoy

Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:

Price alerts · in the RumX app

Never miss a price drop.

Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.

★ 4.8/5 on App Store & Play Store
Oliver, founder of RumX Oliver · Founder

By rum lovers, for rum lovers

I'm Oliver, and RumX began in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.

What began as my digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans, today carried by a small team with Jakob, Lukas and Katharina, with Robert supporting us as a freelancer. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence, without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.

Oliver, Stuttgart

About RumX →
53,000+ Active tasters
300,000+ Independent reviews
25,000+ Rums catalogued
★ 4.8/5 iOS & Android app
As featured in
Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Rating guide

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict. Here's what each band means.

9.0–10.0 Excellent Stash as many as you can afford. Tell no one.
8.0–8.9 Very good your rum Bank a backup. Tell everyone you meet.
7.0–7.9 Good Buy one and recommend it to your friends.
6.0–6.9 Pleasant Solid, super glad I drank it.
5.0–5.9 Average Totally acceptable.
4.0–4.9 Drinkable Not vocally complaining.
3.0–3.9 Poor Wish I was drinking something else.
2.0–2.9 Very poor Nothing nice to say.
1.0–1.9 Unpleasant No, that's not for me.
0.1–0.9 Inedible Pour it out.