2ffc5640-80e0-11ee-bb7f-9589fcda642fCuba The Whisky Jury
The Whisky Jury The Many Faces of Rum 1978 70cl bottle
Cuba · 56,6%

The Whisky Jury The Many Faces of Rum 1978

8.2/10 56 community reviews ↓
Loved by Jakob, SaibotZtar & 38 more

For experienced palates: a 44‑year-old, unsweetened Puerto Rican (often perceived as old Cuban-style) sipper at 56.6%. Expect dark chocolate, tobacco, old wood, dried fruits and caramel. Polarising but widely respected among 56 RumX reviewers.

  • Old‑wood complexity
  • Chocolate & tobacco
  • Alcohol well integrated
416.86 € incl. VAT Last bottle available
RumInvestor.de · 70cl · 595.51 €/l
Total 436.76 € (416.86 € 19.90 € shipping to Germany)
Visa Mastercard PayPal Klarna +9
Offer details from 416.86 €
Shop Delivery Volume Shipping Total
RumX is featured in Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Details about The Whisky Jury The Many Faces of Rum 1978

CountryCuba
ABV56,6%
Volume70cl
Age44 years
Vintage1978
Bottled2023
Cask no.#1
Limited edition251 bottles

Embed this rum on your blog Create widget →

How does The Whisky Jury The Many Faces of Rum 1978 taste?

Aggregated from 56 community reviews.

Dark, woody, polarising old-timer For experienced palates: a 44‑year-old, unsweetened Puerto Rican (often perceived as old Cuban-style) sipper at 56.6%. Expect dark chocolate, tobacco, old wood, dried fruits and caramel. Polarising but widely respected among 56 RumX reviewers.

Perfect for

Fans of dark, mature Spanish-style rums who enjoy cigar-pairing aromas like tobacco, leather, roasted coffee and old wood with a drier, unsweetened profile at robust strength.

Less suitable for

Newcomers, sweetness-seekers, or drinkers expecting fruity, oily intensity; the dry, woody, slightly thin and bitter profile can disappoint if you chase big body over old-wood nuance.

How is The Whisky Jury The Many Faces of Rum 1978 rated?

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict , 8.2 lands squarely in the "Very good" band. 91% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 1% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →

0–1
1–2
2–3
3–4
4–5
5–6
6–7
7–8
8–9
9–10

Rum reviews

A selection of the most popular reviews from our community. You can view the complete list in our app.

Based on 56 ratings

Review by Jakob

Feb 20251,419 reviewsSwitzerland
8.4/10

Interesting profile that definitely shows its age, but without being overpowering. Chocolate and dried fruit aromas add some sweetness, but remain in the background due to the barrel aromas, milk coffee, leathery meat notes and fresh fruit aromas. Well-balanced and easy to drink, delicious, just a little too little pointed in the individual aromas, which is somewhat at the expense of complexity.

Review by Gunnar Böhme "Bauerngaumen" 🤓

Apr 2024630 reviewsGermany
7.8/10

You have to be strong now: This rum is a bitter disappointment for me and does not live up to my high expectations. While it still gives a hint of its Cuban origins on the nose at the beginning and is quite pleasing, I smell something like thickened, dark cherry juice (syrup, but later sweaty feet), and still maintains the level on the palate at the beginning (without being too weak on the chest for me!), it unfortunately falls off enormously in the finish, which is important for me, as a disgusting resinous note dominates, which strangely reminds me of the failed Virgin Oak experiment RX16012. The nose just about saves the rum in the 70s range. Sorry, but that's my subjective impression, which shouldn't stop you from tasting this Methuselah for yourself. Update 2024-02-06: Tasted the rum again together with Lot-NAS and now have to apologize - at least a little: After a very long time to breathe, the rum seems even more syrupy, as if thickened. I no longer notice the unpleasant resin taste. Conclusion: A beautiful, ancient sipper with unusual power, a flagship of the Spanish style, even if not quite round. Definitely needs a long breath! Update 2024-04-10: Finally direct tasting today against the Cuban 1992 from Wu Dram Clan (RX18823) and the difference could hardly be greater. I see my earlier separate assessments confirmed: They may both come from the same distillery, but where I taste succinctly fine cocoa in the 92, in the 78 it's just penetrating tasting damp, charred wood - like a campfire that was put out yesterday and got rain overnight. The 78 has simply been in the barrel too long.

Review by SaibotZtar

Jan 2024511 reviewsGermany
8.3/10

1000s of tastings... it should be something special... at least that's what I thought. Nose Lots of dried fruit grape, raisin ... Dark chocolate, caramel and a delicious sweetness. Palate Less fruity... Chocolate some coffee and wood .... lots of bitters .... Finish... Wood and bitter notes, somewhat musty. I have to say that I'm a little disappointed. Nose Top Palate Flop probably hits it quite well ... although flop is a bit harsh 🤗 because it tastes good but just not what I expected or hoped for.

Review by Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰

Feb 20245,487 reviewsDenmark
8.5/10

#4598 03.02.2024 Got back from shopping in Germany and picking up my packages with samples and bottles. Thank you Gunnar for the nice samples for the DK community. This rum needs to rest for a good while before it opens up properly. I like it and it's a pretty powerful rum when thinking about most Cuban releases we see. It's also one of those rums that will split waters ☺️ Nose Elegant and light, round, fruity, light smoke, faint floral, glue. Palate Medium dry, wood, roasted, fruity, spicy, light chocolate, faint caramel. Finish Very long, dry, spicy, wood, roasted, dried fruit. Beautiful slow moving curtains in the glass. The empty glass has stronger chocolate, tannins, faint workshop notes.

Review by zabo

Aug 20241,467 reviewsGermany
8.1/10

Edit: On the spontaneous Cuba evening, the RX18823, the RX17933 and the RX20297 competed against each other. For me, the bottling from The Whisky Agency is the winner. All are more on the woody side and seem a little one-dimensional. I put the WuDram in last place, as it has an unpleasant acidity in the taste. I personally expected a little more from this rum. The basic data actually sounded quite exciting. But unfortunately it disappoints a little. Not bad, but not convincing enough.

Review by Leo Krüper

Jan 2024872 reviewsGermany
6.8/10

Caramelized ashtray. A total failure for the price.

Review by Dr.Django

May 2024331 reviewsGermany
8.5/10

A small but fine Cubatasting is on the agenda today. Ever since I tried the Valdespino, I've been looking for a similar profile (tobacco, leather, dark fruit, old wood, fireplace, light smoke, full-bodied, oily and fat texture) at cask strength. Let's see if we can find it here. A Venezuelan has also sneaked in =P 1st Plantation Cuba: Dances out of line in terms of color. Fruitier and not at all what I imagine my Cuban to be like. The sweetest and also by far the most boring of the tasting. 75 pts (second tasting: -2 pts) 2nd Rome Deluxe Cuba: A positive surprise at.first tasting and still very tasty. Has the aromas mentioned at the beginning, also some yellow fruits, plus slightly creamy and quite wild on the palate. Not overly complex, but very pleasing. 86 pts (second tasting: +2 pts) 3rd Wudramclan Cuba 1992: Tastes like the consistent evolution of Romdeluxe's Cuban. Not as wild, somewhat more one-dimensional fruit flavors, much more leather and tobacco, some ash. Very short and fruity-ashy finish. 85 pts. 4th The Whisky Jury Cuba 1978: When this came out I had high hopes: great bottler, almost unbelievable key data, that color... In this comparison, it seems to me that the Cubans not only lose their impetuousness with age, but also their variety of aromas and structure. All the fruit in this rum is burnt, strangely enough this rum is very light on the tongue and not fat and oily as I had hoped. The tobacco, the wood and the fruit literally turn to ash in the mouth. Somehow I like that, but on the other hand it is not at all an upgrade to the Rom Deluxe Cuban, if you compare them directly. 85 pts (third tasting: -4 pts) 5th Cadenheads Dictador 26 yo: My Cuban in a Venezuelan coat! That's how I imagine it! Great aromas, great oily, fat structure. Tobacco, old wood, some ash (for me still and fitting in the aroma spectrum). <3 88 pts. Many thanks to Mto75 for the samples!

Review by Tschusikowsky

Apr 2024491 reviewsSwitzerland
8.2/10

Blind würde ich das alter nicht herausschmecken. Der Rum ist zwar vom holz geprägt aber keinenfalls übermässig. Im Gegenteil er ist noch relativ fruchtig. Unterwegs kamen mir Assoziationen von Gummifröschen und Malibu. Tropisch Früchte, Leder, Tabak, Kokosnuss, karamell, Vanille, Pfirsich und Maracuja. Mir hat er beim ersten mal besser gefallen. Insgesamt doch sehr kurzer Abgang.

Rate

Community purchases

38 bottles logged by 52,000+ RumX members. The ratio of closed / opened / emptied, indicates whether this rum is meant to be drunk or is a collector's item.

12 Closed In collections, sealed
1 Opened Being poured right now
4 Emptied Finished, came back for more
29% Open rate Share that isn't sealed

Also on the wishlist of 9 members.

In the app
Track the market value of each bottle in your collection
Live auction-house prices, retail drops, and RumX community trades, updated daily.
Download app →

You may also enjoy

Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:

Price alerts · in the RumX app

Don't miss out on any more deals on The Whisky Jury The Many Faces of Rum 1978.

Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.

★ 4.8/5 on App Store & Play Store
Oliver, founder of RumX Oliver · Founder

By rum lovers, for rum lovers

I'm Oliver, together with Jakob, Robert and Lukas, we started RumX in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.

What began as a digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence, without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.

Oliver, Stuttgart

About RumX →
52,000+ Active tasters
280,000+ Independent reviews
25,000+ Rums catalogued
★ 4.8/5 iOS & Android app
As featured in
Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Rating guide

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict. Here's what each band means.

9.0–10.0 Excellent Stash as many as you can afford. Tell no one.
8.0–8.9 Very good Bank a backup. Tell everyone you meet.
7.0–7.9 Good Buy one and recommend it to your friends.
6.0–6.9 Pleasant Solid, super glad I drank it.
5.0–5.9 Average Totally acceptable.
4.0–4.9 Drinkable Not vocally complaining.
3.0–3.9 Poor Wish I was drinking something else.
2.0–2.9 Very poor Nothing nice to say.
1.0–1.9 Unpleasant No, that's not for me.
0.1–0.9 Inedible Pour it out.