Aroma visualization from community tastings
Saint James Les Éphémères - N°6 2006
"So fruity and fun," one member sums it up, and that's the pull here: roasted pineapple, candied orange peel and banana up front, then Saint James wood, cocoa and spice taking over. The 16-year cask strength shows as pepper and drying tannin. Give it air. A few tasters find it bitter and one-note next to No. 1 of the series, but the orange-forward nose wins a lot of people over.
The community says- Orange-peel nose
- Ripe tropical fruit
- But: Bitter, tannic
View price history
10 more payment methodsSecure payment Sold by Excellence Rhum Returns & cancellation
- Secure payment. You pay via RumX with PayPal, Klarna or card. Your payment data is encrypted and we never store your full card details.
- Clear seller. Sold and shipped directly by the partner shop. And you're never on your own: RumX handles support and communication with the shop, so you always get excellent service, whichever shop you order from.
- Honest shop ratings. The stars show your service experience with the shop, not the rum score. They come from RumX users, and critical ones stay visible.
- Returns & cancellation. Your purchase contract is with the shop, so returns and cancellations run through them under their own policy and your statutory rights. If anything goes wrong, RumX helps you sort it out.
Buy Saint James Les Éphémères - N°6 2006:
Offer details
Prices & availability last updated on
The look inside the bottle
How does Saint James Les Éphémères - N°6 2006 taste?
Aggregated from 158 community reviews.
Fruity agricole that turns woody and tannic Loved for its fruity, orange-heavy nose, though the palate turns woody, tannic and a touch bitter. Several rank it below No. 1; a few call it eindimensional. Needs air.
Aged agricole fans who like fruit-forward, woody cask strength
Beginners and anyone put off by oak, tannin or bitterness
How the community classifies this rum. Each category takes you to similar rums.
Which glass for which rum? The community guide →
54 of 158 left detailed tasting impressions · Click an aroma to explore similar rums
Recommendation
Your next rum
One difference each to this rum.
Rated better
Saint James Les Ephémères - N°1 2001
8.8/10295 €
Milder
Excellence Rhum Saint James Brut de Fût (Excellence Rhum's 10th Anniversary) 2006
8.5/10119 €
Similar rating, cheaper
Foursquare ECS XXIV 2011
8.4/1089 €First choice: 88 of 109 tasters who tried both prefer it.
How is Saint James Les Éphémères - N°6 2006 rated?
RumX’s 0–10 scale is strict: 8.5 sits in the “Very good” band. 98% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 0% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →
Community voices
What does the community say?
90% rate it 8 or higher. 48 selected write-ups from 158 community ratings. You can view the complete list in our app.
Review by Gunnar Böhme "Bauerngaumen" 🤓
Most helpful positive review
Hmm, heretical question: could it possibly be that this rhum is generally overrated in the euphoric exuberance in the face of a four-piece set perfectly prepared for collectors? 🤔 Too much advance praise? I certainly had to drink it in first. 😳 After the typical notes of whitewashed wall dominate the nose, the rhum on the palate lacks almost everything that fascinated me about the first release in the series. Only towards the end, on the finish, is there a certain spicy power that compensates somewhat for the seemingly arbitrary impression on the palate. Nevertheless, no comparison with the divine No. 1, rather with the already weakening No. 7 (even if a direct crosstasting is still pending). I wouldn't have thought so. Bad form on the day? Update 2023-04-14: No, it's not due to poor form on the day. 🤷♂️ Tasted today directly against the already legendary Les Epheméres No. 1. The No. 6 can make up a little ground (80 instead of 78 points), but can't hold a candle to the No. 1, remains somehow one-dimensional. Update 2024-02-11: Tasted again in parallel with the Saint James/Excellence Rhum (RX18129) from the same distillation year. Result as expected: Les Ephemeres No. 6 is in no way a match for the Excellence Rhum. Strangely enough, it has an unpleasant smell of inferior glue on the nose today, at least initially, and an inappropriate sharpness on the palate; the agricole seems unround overall - all in direct comparison to RX18129, mind you. Tasted individually, it would certainly score better. It remains at 80 points.
Review by crazyforgoodbooze
Most helpful mixed review
Somewhat disappointing. Too bitter and sharp-edged and this very intense nutmeg note, overall quite furry and sour. Unfortunately, absolutely not my case...
Review by Mike H.
81 points. When I sampled this rum at the Rhumfest my note was 82 points. The weakest release in the series so far.
Review by Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰
#4153 This release is also doing pretty well once rested for a while. Roasted wood with nice fruits and spices. Good balance between the elements, also the ABV is well integrated. Draws really nice curtains in the glass and the empty glass has some chocolate and light grass. Price to quality is very good in my mind.
Review by mto75
today the
Review by Thunderbird
The third in the bunch...and I like it quite well, it can be enjoyed with a certain ease . On the nose quite unobtrusive with a pleasant fruity note, on the palate an interplay of fruit, wood and spice , the latter also dominates the finish. However, it needs time in the glass
Review by Rodolphe
Tasted quickly on the Rhumfest so to try again. Between the 1 and the 7 for me. So very nice Agricole very well made. But personally, for the same amount or close to it, I prefer to buy something else (neisson XO or single cask HSE). I'm not a collector that must be why 😉
Review by Maxime Clr 🇫🇷
A bombshell tasted at the Rum Fest, very close to the ephemeral 1. EDIT: fabulous nose, very typical SJ palate on the oak. But very good keel.
Review by LukaŽiga
8,6:On the nose, fresh sugarcane, earthy, mineral, waxy, sandal wood with black pepper, some tropical fruits and orange peel, bump into our nosetrils. On aeration, the cane is flowery, caramelized notes, vanilla and chocolate arise. 8,8:On the palate, the attack is delicious with flowery and mineral sugarcane, strong barrel impact with nuts, cocoa, leather, spicy vanilla, the oak is pretty obvious, as there are variety of different fruit aspect with raisins, tropical fruits and orange peel. 8,8:The finish is long, dry and tannic, delicious, balanced, with grassy cane, a lot of spices like cinnamon, nutmeg, vanilla, pepper and caramelized, roasted nuts, as the fruits are dried and citrus..
Review by Vincent D
I found it much better than the 7 I tested. Frankly woody, but not overpowering. More gourmand, and surely more accessible too. A powerful finish with a bitterness counterbalanced by a pleasant sweetness. Edit: it's still VERY woody. But the spices save the day. Strange series.
Review by Jarek
That's how subjective taste sensations can be... for me, the "Wow!" came as soon as I opened the bottle. Fruity, spicy, woody, still unmistakably an agricole. But also almost a little funky. By no means worse than the other brothers in the range. But we won't be tasting them together until No. 5 is on the table. Addendum: Finally tasted all four Ephemeres together today. All four are very good and I can hardly pick a favorite. I like No. 6 very much on the nose, with its clear orange notes. On the palate, it would be No. 1.
Review by Jakob
Compared to the first two Les Ephémeres releases, the most fruity, apart from that located between the 2001 and 2007 - the spicy notes are reminiscent of the 2001, but do not present themselves with quite the same intensity. The quite elegant sweet wood notes are again reminiscent of the 2007 vintage release. Again, a very coherent complement to the first two releases, which further reinforces my enthusiasm about the selection in the Les Ephémeres series. Once again, a very successful release.
Review by Serge
Tasted very good to me ... caramelized notes of orange peel, wood, resin. hmmm have written down that the orange color of the wax seal fits very well with the taste. Were probably a few too many 😂Very good at the release price 👌
Review by TheRhumhoe
Les attentes sont grandes lorsqu’il s’agit de la saga des Éphémères, et ce rhum ne déroge pas à la règle. On découvre un profil particulièrement équilibré, oscillant entre puissance et gourmandise, entre finesse et expression. Le nez est sec, intense mais très avenant et s’accompagne d’une certaine fraîcheur. On retrouve tout ce qui fait la réputation de Saint James : un boisé fin, des notes sombres de café, de cacao et de chocolat, une trame avec une sensation de roti et des épices qui agrément parfaitement le profil olfactif. Les fruits secs, la canne à sucre et le tabac complètent le tableau aromatique. L’attaque en bouche est ronde et complexe. On retrouve la gourmandise des fruits tropicaux, des fruits secs et du chocolat, le côté asséchant des tanins, l’influence sombre des notes empyreumatiques et boisées, les arômes liés aux épices, le tabac et la canne à sucre pour le côté plus végétal. On retrouve le parfait équilibre entre élégance et exubérance. L’alcool est très bien intégré. La finale, très longue, est encore plus sèche. Les épices, le cuir et le boisé reviennent à la charge, tandis que les notes végétales, les tanins et les fruits secs concluent parfaitement ce profil complet et haut en couleurs. Une excellente cuvée, plus riche que le Numéro 7 mais légèrement moins complexe et profonde que le Numéro 1 de la série. Elle fait clairement partie du haut de gamme du rhum agricole.
Review by Chrischi78
Der Kampf beginnt schon mit dem Wachsverschluss 😇Dann ist es ein schlner Agricole mit nette würzigen Noten, aber mich begeistert er nicht komplett. Geschmacklich mit Ecken und Kanten erreicht er nicht das schöne runde und reiche Mundgefühl des No.1. Eine leichte alkoholische Schärfe verhindert dann endgültig den Einstieg in die 80!Punkte. Letztlich solide
Review by Leo Krüper
Schmeckt wie ein kontinentaler Caroni, nur als Agricole. Super Farbe und Nase. Ich vermute fast etwas überlagert, dadurch sehr intensive Geschmäcker nach Teer, Aschenbecher und roten Früchten. Kriegt aber gerade noch die Kurve und driftet nicht komplett in Bitterstoffe ab. Kein Rum für Anfänger.
Review by cigares
First RumX meeting. Un nez ample de fruits tropicaux avec beaucoup de végétal et d’herbes sèches, des fruits jaunes et des agrumes aussi. La bouche est ample, très fruitée mais avec toujours des herbes sèches. Le bois est marqué mais s’harmonise bien avec les autres arômes. La finale est plutôt longue avec un côté pâtissier, épicé et des herbes sèches.
Review by Djehey
Dégustation comparative des éphémère 7, 6, 5. J'ai déjà pu apprécier une bouteille de l'éphémère 1. Globalement, on perçoit immédiatement la Martinique. On pourrait aussi reconnaître la patte de Saint James avec son boisé qui part sur l'empyreumatique 7 : le nez est plus fermé que les 2 autres mais la bouche à un belle équilibre avec un boisé pas trop présent. 5 : profil plus boisé et épicé mais aussi avec une touche de colle, vernis, menthol qu'on retrouve en bouche. Vanille bien présente sur la finale 6 : il me semble un peu à la jointure des deux précédents. Belle longueur. Au final, ce sont 3 beaux jus. La préférence dépendra des goûts de chacun. Me concernant, j'ai une préférence pour le 7 puis le 6 et enfin le 5.
Review by Lukas Jäger
Contrasting worlds: As he breathes in the glass and waits for me, I can hardly wait, a sweet fruity smell attracts me. From No. 1 and 7 I was only semi-enthusiastic; not bad, but also not my highlight.At closer "Hinriechen" then neat barrel, but also fruity citrus aromas and a waxy smell.On the palate then unfortunately full disappointment: Sour and bitter, a lot of wood, tannins and the citrus flavors taste maximum still like a cutting board of wood on which any citrus fruits were cut.For me, unfortunately, far away from top bottling. No idea how you can give this around 90 points....
Review by Maxence
Another release from "Les Éphémères" serie by Saint James. Nose is fantastic with great balance and aromatic depth. On the palate, alcohol integration is not as good as for the nose. However, aromas are quite close although it feels a bit dryer. A very good agricole !
Review by HenryL
Im Vergleich zur No. 1 deutlich intensiver in der Nase. Eine extreme Bananennote sticht am meisten hervor, ungewohnt aber geil. Der Alkohol ist hier allerdings auch scharfkantiger. Knappes Rennen, nach dem ersten Eindruck liegt die No. 1 für mich wegen des besser integrierten Alkohols einen Punkt vorne
Review by Andi
Agricole with a kick, light caramel and orange / citrus nuances... I will taste it again on occasion.
Review by Boletus
In my experience with St. James, there is always a risk of overpowering woodiness, although the bottlings from the Éphémères series I've tried so far have been exceptions. Here too, the nose doesn't initially suggest too much barrel influence, even though alongside a pleasant fruitiness, there's already a spicy and dark woody aroma. The fruity start on the palate then increasingly gains acidity and ultimately takes a turn towards massive, polished oak with noticeable bitterness. You should also like walnuts with thick skins, over-steeped black tea – almost reminiscent of espresso – and dark chocolate, as well as pronounced spice notes with peppery hints towards allspice, nutmeg, and cloves. For my palate, accustomed to bitterness, this is still bearable, which is why I quite like this rum, but it probably shouldn't get much more intense than this.
Review by zabo
Since had completely forgotten to evaluate this at the tasting. But what remains in my memory to this day is the orange in association with the seal of the bottle. He has already tasted very good to me only the orange flavor was a little too dominant.
Review by Timo Groeger
Als ich die Bewertungen gesehen habe, wusste ich auch nicht mehr. Ist gut, aber das war es dann auch für mich schon, ist keine 8,5, wahrscheinlich weil die Orangenschale (mag ich ja nicht so), hier Vanille, Karamell und Holz zu sehr übertüncht.
Review by Julien Ries
Le nez est beaucoup plus expressif sur les fruits exotiques : ananas rôti, zeste d'orange confit qui apporte une légère amertume. C'est le plus fruité de la collection. On sent aussi de la mangue bien mûre, du massepain qui assèche un peu les narines. La vanille et le poivre reste là. Un second nez apporte des marqueurs de chêne très poussiéreux. La bouche confirme le nez sur la dominance des fruits dans cette éphémère 6. Beaucoup de fruits compotés, mais aussi une marmelade d'orange. C'est aussi le plus pimenté de la série, et il chauffe le gosier. L'alcool reste néanmoins superbement intégré. La vanille est encore bien présente. Le boisé est en revanche en retrait. La finale est longue, mais raisonnable comparé au 7. Le côté fruité nous hante un bon moment, et le piment réchauffe la langue longtemps. J'aime beaucoup les rhums assez fruité. Plus que le côté très épicé ou empyreumatique de certains rhums vieux. L'amertume pourrait déranger mais moi j'ai bien aimé.
Review by Nivius
On the les Ephemeres I was really excited, because it has given the impression of being something special.And I find it is indeed a beautiful and tasty rum, however, I also share Gunnar's assessment in terms of hype and that he would not be worth 120€ to me, let alone the late sale price.But now to the taste: the association to whitewashed wall I absolutely share and I find, under the sweetness and fruitiness you can still taste that through. Otherwise, I find here still a nice fruitiness even with hints of fruit tea and herbs, wood, a certain mustiness / sea water and glue.At the end I still perceive a certain astringency / peppery / cinnamon.To the RumClub Depaz he comes for but not ran, because he lacks for it complexity.Since I have tasted at this time not too many aged Agricole, I probably still lack something in reference.
Review by Speedflo
Ich habe ein Crosstasting gmacht mit den Saint James les Éphémèresn°5-7. Allesamt sehr leckere rum, aussgewogen, holzig, würzig, typisch martinique N°5 find ich alles in allem am spannendsten,obwohl mir in der Nase n°6 am beste zugesagt hat.
Review by Tafia Guildive
Nase: initial leicht Terpentin, dann Cola, Zimt, gerösteter Marshmallow, braune Butter, Mais, Eiche, Maggi/Kräuter, Nelke, Gras, zum Ende Cola und Terpentin mit Eiche und einem Hauch Zitrone. Sehr Angenehme Nase, sehr Bourbonlastig. Gaumen: Zimt, Eiche, Popcorn, Kräuter, röstig, Mais, dunkle Bitterschokolade, Kakao, Cremig mild aber intensives Holz, Mineralig-erdig, Am Ende verbranntes Karamell und Paprika. Im Abgang mittellang, Eiche bleibt noch länger Auf der dunklen Seite zuhause, sehr gut! Wer Holz mag, wird hier Spaß haben.
Review by Morgan Garet
The legs are fat on the walls of the glass. 1st nose on waxed wood, light notes of tropical fruits and roasted almonds. Then it opens on fruits, chocolate and caramel all wrapped in this bewitching waxed wood. After long minutes vanilla settles in. A note of cherry makes a brief appearance. In mouth, what a greediness! We take the same actors as on the nose and we start again. Then the undergrowth and the spices settle on the tongue. Long finish on spices and caramel.
Review by Fabrice Rouanet
Magnifique couleur burnt qui marque un vieillissement long et repos obligatoire avant dégustation. Le nez est d’une forte intensité, très expressif; du fruité avec la banane cuite, la compotée de fruits mûrs, des épices fortes (poivre noir, cannelle) et des notes empyreumatiques prononcées : chocolat noir, boîte à cigares, un boisé intense et enfin une note alcoolique intense. En bouche, l’aromatique change de tonalité, et ce brut de fût nous transporte avec une forte intensité alcoolique, des épices dominantes, un boisé tannique (astringent). En second plan, les arômes fruités sont tout de même présents. La finale est très longue, d’abord sur l’alcool, puis les épices et le boisé et enfin le fruit et la cannelle. En toute fin de bouche, je retrouve une aromatique de sous-bois et de champignon. Très belle découverte.
Review by TheJackDrop
Un peu perdu après les numéros 5 et 7, dont le 7 que j’avais goûté en premier m’avait d’époustouflé mais finalement on dirait tous les mêmes ou presque… Bientôt un tasting 1 vs 6 côte à côte pour comparer.
Review by Nils123
Gefällt mir ausgesprochen gut. Schöne Oragennoten in Verbindung mit Kakao, Holz und Würze. Ein traumhafter langer Nachhall auf der Zunge.
Review by Nando70
Un bouquet complexe vous attends... On y retrouve des notes de fraîcheur, un floral qui vous titille la narine le tout sur un lit de douceur fruitée... Qu'elle mise en train! Allez en bouche... Une petite approche douce qui passe à l'épicé et enfin le boisé apparaît dans un laps de temps assez court... MAIS quel équilibre... en fin de bouche dans un premier temps une touche d'astringence apparaît mais le boisé du fût et un épicé lui emboîte le pas. Patientez avant de reprendre une gorgée de ce nectar et profitez de la longue effluve du boisé... Top! Un excellent rhum à goûter et à avoir.
Review by Rene Pfeiffer
Cross-tasting of the 4 Ephemeres Saint James: The 2001 is by far the best. A great, well-balanced Agricole, which is the oldest in the group at 20y, but tastes the least woody and bitter after the 2007, which is the youngest. 2007: nice, rather fruity, 8.3. 2006: bitter and woody in comparison, 7.9. 2005: balanced (8.5), but not as fine as the 2001 (8.9).
Review by Schnapsschuesse
Der braucht vor allem erstmal etwas Luft für jeden der kein beinharter Agricole Fan ist. Wenn dann nach fünf Minuten der Alkohol etwas verflogen ist wird's enorm fruchtig in der Nase. Zestig-ölige Orange, bittere Zitrus, tropisches Holz, leichtes Karamell. Wachs, Klebstoff und etwas Schokolade dahinter. Kräftig, leicht würzig und sehr einnehmend. Am Gaumen dann dick, süß und deutlich milder im Alkohol als noch in der Nase. Auch hier spielen Orange und Karamell die erste Geige, überraschend süß dabei. Abgelöst von Holz, Schokolade, dem Ansatz von Lack und würziger, nicht schnapsiger Schärfe. Im Abgang dann durch und durch Agricole, wenn auch dunkler in der Frische. Lang anhaltend, enorm potent und fruchtig.
Review by Émile Shevek
Soft and fresh nose with solvents, tobacco, unripe fruit, milk chocolate, delicate spices and light sweet wood. On the palate rich and pungent with tobacco, wood, caramelized hazelnuts, milk chocolate, some light spice and sweet dried fruit on the finish, along with a fine vegetal and citrus side. Delicious and pleasant with a strong identity
Review by Gregor
Erst etwas stehen lassen. Nase: ok bis interessant; Kirsche, Moka, etwas Alkohol erinnert an Mon Cherry, Mund: glasierte, rote Kirsche; Brombeere; Zwetschgen; etwas schwarze, leicht salzige Schokolade, das Metallische und der Alkohol ist nicht so gut eingebunden, trotz des Alkohols könnten die Aromen intensiver sein. Mittlerer Abgang.
Review by Roman Lelek
The color - i really like, it looks between brown and red, from the top it’s golden. The nose- at first I smell glue, wood, vanilla and some tropical fruit - orange? The pallet - complex with nice ending- I still feel it after several minutes.. I feel glue, warm, spicy, woody tones..
Review by Filip Šikula
Zatím nejlepší ze čtveřice, ale čeká mne ještě sedmička. Perfektně integorovanej alkohol, nic nepáli, ovoce přechází do technického závěru. Pecka pecka pecka Drobně kazí radost rozpadlý uzávěr, ale asi to půjde přežít :-)
Review by Nika
I didn’t like the “technical” part. But I liked the mustiness and fruitiness. When I smelled it, I firstly found some grass there, but it was there just for a sec.
Review by Barnagricole
Aurait nécessité une petite réduction supplémentaire. Très bon, des fruits jaunes mais manque d'équilibre sur la finale.
Review by Michal S
O kousek slabší než No. 1, zejména v chuti, ale stále jde o velmi dobrý rum, který se vyplatí vyzkoušet.
Review by Niko
Goûté au Rhumfest Paris, le petit dernier est très intéressant mais peut être un peu en dessous de ses prédécesseurs dans mon souvenir ( surtout le 1) on reste sur du haut niveau dans le Martiniquais de cette âge !
Review by Gyuli
향 : 아몬드, 땅콩, 헤즐넛 따위의 견과류가 강해서 독특하다. 그 다음 포도가 잠깐 지나가고, 갓 구운 빵 같은 향이 났다. 다시 한 번 노징하면 매니큐어 냄새가 분명하고, 후추가 있다. 향신료는 잘 모르지만, 인도 식당에서 날 법한 냄새도 조금 섞여있다. 알콜은 거의 느껴지지 않는다. 맛 : 향과 맛이 다르다. 볏짚 씹는 것 같은 맛인데, 오래된 소설책을 먹는 것 같기도 하다. 라이 위스키를 마실 때의 몰트 노트가 묵직하게 올라온다. 두세번째 입에서는 말린 꽃, 가죽, 오크 맛이 난다. 목넘김 : 아몬드를 약간 섞은 옥수수차를 1리터쯤 마신 것 같다. 텁텁함과 오크가 아주 길게 남는다. 한참뒤에 입맛을 다셔봐도 곡물을 달인 향이 남아있다.
Review by Quentin Leseigneur
Un très beau nez, complet, rond et gourmand. La bouche est puissante,boisée, rappellant une vieille eau de vie et le pur jus de canne.
Review by Alex1981
Less expressive than the first two, a bit mellow
Review by Rhum Mirror 🇧🇪
🔥 Saint James – Les Éphémères 2006 (n°6) – 54,4 % La série des Éphémères a marqué les esprits à sa sortie : quatre embouteillages confidentiels, bruts de fût, issus de vieux millésimes non ouillés (sans complétion des fûts). Une pratique rare qui accentue l’expression du vieillissement. Entre 2 700 et 5 000 bouteilles selon les références, un packaging épuré et mystérieux (verre noir, distinction par la cire et le numéro), et un prix étonnamment accessible pour ce niveau de gamme (115–125 €), la série a rapidement acquis un statut culte. Petit clin d’œil malin : les numéros 1, 7, 6 et 5 font référence aux millésimes… et assemblés forment 1765, année de fondation de la distillerie. Ici, le n°6 correspond au millésime 2006 embouteillé à 54,4 %. Nez : fruits, agrumes, boisé terreux. Bouche : puissante, épicée, boisée, fruitée, avec une belle ampleur. Finale : longue, épices et fruits, puis un boisé qui prend progressivement le dessus, accompagné d’une touche mentholée. Un profil intense, encore très fruité, mais déjà largement structuré par le bois.
No reviews match this filter.
Expert reviews
2 critics scored it, averaging 8.5/10. Reviews from RumX's blog partners, independent experts who have tasted, evaluated, and described this rum..
Expert review by Rhummer
Read full review →Volendo fare un paragone con il Saint James 2006 di Excellence Rhum (che ho recensito tempo fa), preferisco quell’edizione: più rotonda, più elegante...più nelle mie corde. Questo n°6 resta comunque un buon rhum che va provato.
Expert review by Préférence Rhum
Read full review →
Live auctions
Current bids for this rum at Europe's leading auction houses.
Market value
What this bottle last achieved at auction. A research indicator, not a forecast.
Auction results 73 € – 132 €
from 12 sales, latest 07/2026
Prices incl. buyer's premium — what a buyer pays, not what a sale nets you.
Avg. community purchase price 125 €
What members paid for this bottle, self-reported. Not a market value — the purchases are over three years old at the median and unverified.
Details about Saint James Les Éphémères - N°6 2006
A Rhum Agricole AOC from Martinique, distilled by Saint James, at 54,4%.
Community purchases
363 bottles logged by 250 collectors.
A collector's bottle.
11% opened, 18 emptied and repurchased.
What does Saint James Les Éphémères - N°6 2006 cost?
Community paid 115–137 €.
Current best price: 125.00 € – within the typical community range.
What members actually paid for their bottles. A typical range, not the current shop price. Full price & collection history in RX+ →
+5 purchases in the last 3 months.
Added to collections, last 12 months — dark bars are the last 3.
363 purchased · 161 tasted · 43 wishlist · as of
Read on in the RumX Guide
You may also enjoy
Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:
Velier Saint James 70th Anniversary 2008
Velier Saint James 70th Anniversary 2008Dark, oaky cask-strength agricole that needs time
Saint James Les Éphémères - N°5 2005
Saint James Les Éphémères - N°5 2005Dry, woody aged Martinique agricole
Foursquare ECS XXII Touchstone 2008
Foursquare ECS XXII Touchstone 2008Dry, woody, spicy Foursquare with cognac edge
J. Bally Brut de Fût 2004
J. Bally Brut de Fût 2004Dark, woody agricole with heavy glue notes
Savanna Unshared Cask for Belgium 2010
Savanna Unshared Cask for Belgium 2010Woody, Armagnac-cask Savanna with grape and mint
Never miss a price drop.
Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.
Oliver · FounderBy rum lovers, for rum lovers
I'm Oliver, and RumX began in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.
What began as my digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans, today carried by a small team with Jakob, Lukas and Katharina, with Robert supporting us as a freelancer. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence, without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.
Oliver, Stuttgart
About RumX →YouTube channel (in German)
