The Origin: now available to everyone. While stocks last. →
5a1c12d0-4d38-11ed-b3fa-9bb087f8e68eGuyana Port Mourant The Whisky Jury
The Whisky Jury Port Mourant Nanayang Whisky Singapore 1989 70cl bottle
Bottle
View 2
Aged rum · 33 years · 46,7%

The Whisky Jury Port Mourant Nanayang Whisky Singapore 1989

Sipped neat, this old Demerara leans hard into wood — leather, licorice and black tea sit up front, with red fruit and anise underneath. Several tasters call it a "typical PM" profile but on the dry, dark side. The catch keeps coming up: at 46.7% it reads a touch thin and short, and a few wished for more proof to carry the age.

The community says
  • Anise & leather
  • Classic PM olive
  • But: Thin body
Currently no offers for delivery to Germany.

The look inside the bottle

How does The Whisky Jury Port Mourant Nanayang Whisky Singapore 1989 taste?

Aggregated from 15 community reviews.

Dry, wood-forward Port Mourant with a thin body Well-liked but not adored — most find it a gentle, wood-forward PM that needs air, marked down for thin body and a short finish at this proof.

Perfect for

Demerara fans who like dry, woody old PM

Less suitable for

anyone wanting rich, full-bodied cask strength

Style & occasion

How the community classifies this rum. Each category takes you to similar rums.

Which glass for which rum? The community guide →

10 of 15 left detailed tasting impressions · Click an aroma to explore similar rums

Recommendation

Your next rum

One difference each to this rum.

How is The Whisky Jury Port Mourant Nanayang Whisky Singapore 1989 rated?

RumX’s 0–10 scale is strict: 8.3 sits in the “Very good” band. 100% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 0% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →

Community voices

What does the community say?

93% rate it 8 or higher. 12 selected write-ups from 15 community ratings. You can view the complete list in our app.

Review by Thunderbird

Thunderbird
Apr 20241,275 reviewsGermany
8.4/10

A pleasant mild PM, but more on the woody side. I like it, but it might not be to everyone's taste. I also detect some red fruit and aniseed on the nose. The same on the palate and minimal olive, alongside the dominant wood. This is also how the finish ends.

Review by DomM

DomM
Jan 2024941 reviewsGermany
8.4/10

Small 1989 Utivlugt cross tasting: Nobilis vs. CorCol vs. CoR vs. Ricci vs. TWJ. On the nose: CoR >>> Ricci > TWJ = Nob > CC With its higher ABV the CoR is playing in a wholly different league - stunning on the nose. CC needs very much time to open up. TWJ with the darkest nose; Most leather and wood forwards. Palate: CoR > Nobilis > CC > TWJ >> Ricci The TWJ also feels a little watered down to much comparatively. However it is better balanced than the Ricci. Wood and herb forwards.

Review by mto75

mto75
Nov 2023701 reviewsGermany
8.3/10

Compared to the Nobilis No 6 (89, 31 yr), the WJ has the more typical PM nose with lots of olive, anise, gooseberry, caramel. Barrel, black tea on the palate. The tart finish compensates quite well for the rather low ABV.

Review by DaveLamb

DaveLamb
Oct 202263 reviewsBelgium
8.2/10

The palate is slightly sour, and there is still 89 Uitvlugt's wood tone, and the woody aroma is not abrupt but not very comfortable. The flavor is a bit messy and missing, that itself (or aging...) or the degree is too low is unknown. The same question as Silver Seal Demerara 89(RX3567), but given that its counterpart is 55.8% but it is only 46.7%, I think there is an improvement. RA 1989(RX7791) solves these problems well, complex and balanced. In general, the flavor concentration of this bottle still needs to be improved and lacks some feature of aging. The finish is short. It's more like whisky, not as rich and powerful as Perola's low-proof rum.

Review by Alex1981

Alex1981
May 2024394 reviewsGermany
8.4/10

Nice gentle profile with damp & mushroomy notes. The wood adds some sweetness & spices, but could be better integrated. Unfortunately a bit thin & short on the finish, would have loved to see this with a higher abv.

Review by Johannes

Johannes
Dec 20232,933 reviewsGermany
8.3/10

Complex despite the low percentages, typical olive PM notes with less fruit, long, somewhat astringent finish.

Review by Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰

Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰
Dec 20235,879 reviewsDenmark
8.4/10

#4501 01.12.2023 This one needs to rest for a good while before giving it a go. A pretty nice release with heavy wood notes on one side and a kind of light profile on the other. Medium fruity with a nice licorice touch. The palate is oily and medium dry with a nice smoky touch. The finish long and warm with some citrus. I really like the light smoky note in the profile. The empty glass has some leather and faint caramel.

Review by TheJona'Spirits

TheJona'Spirits
Feb 2026256 reviewsFrance
8.4/10

👃 Fruits confits de cake de Noël, pâte de fruits (poire, mandarine, abricot, cerise), sève, racines confites, sucre d'orge, bonbons à l'anis, bonbons contre le mal de gorge, réglisse en rouleau. Un peu de goudron chaud par moment, chêne poli, très légère saumure sans les esters. 😋 Pas mal de tanins, on retrouve le boisé réglissé plus qu'anisé, des fruits rouges confits (encore ceux du cake de Noël), un côté fermentaire, des cerises aigres, du cuir, du thé noir, de la fumée de bois, une note d'olive verte. Un profil sec, amer et acide. l'ABV est faible et ne se fait jamais ressentir. Ce dram me fait penser à un whisky très légèrement tourbé vieilli en fût de sherry. ⛳ Longue, chaleur sucrée, douce, amère, astringente, puis asséchante. Le sucre d'orge de plante de montagne, des agrumes et cerises confites, du thé noir, puis du tabac à cigare. 💡 Un très joli Port Morant, sans la note de savon, pas de boisé humide ni de métal. À la place, des fruits confits, des notes végétales et racineuses, une douceur de sucre d'orge sucré amer. Pas d'une complexité sidérante malgré quelques finesses qui apparaissent si on lui laisse le temps. Un joli Demerara loin des profils torréfiés plus connus.

Add your rating

Market value

Avg. community purchase price 366 €

What members paid for this bottle, self-reported. Not a market value — the purchases are over three years old at the median and unverified.

How we calculate this →

Details about The Whisky Jury Port Mourant Nanayang Whisky Singapore 1989

A Pot Still Rum from Guyana, bottled by The Whisky Jury, at 46,7%.

CountryGuyana
DistilleryPort Mourant
CategoryPot Still Rum
DistillationPot Still
ABV46,7%
Volume70cl
Age33 years
Vintage1989
Cask no.#8
Limited edition203 bottles

Embed this rum on your blog Create widget →

Community purchases

3 bottles logged by 3 collectors.

A collector's bottle.

0% opened, 0 emptied and repurchased.

3 sealed 0 open 0 emptied

3 purchased · 15 tasted · 3 wishlist · as of

Read on in the RumX Guide

You may also enjoy

Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:

Price alerts · in the RumX app

Never miss a price drop.

Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.

★ 4.8/5 on App Store & Play Store
Oliver, founder of RumX Oliver · Founder

By rum lovers, for rum lovers

I'm Oliver, and RumX began in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.

What began as my digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans, today carried by a small team with Jakob, Lukas and Katharina, with Robert supporting us as a freelancer. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence, without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.

Oliver, Stuttgart

About RumX →YouTube channel (in German)
53,000+ Active tasters
320,000+ Independent reviews
25,000+ Rums catalogued
★ 4.8/5 iOS & Android app
As featured in
Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Rating guide

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict. Here's what each band means.

9.0–10.0 Excellent Stash as many as you can afford. Tell no one.
8.0–8.9 Very good your rum Bank a backup. Tell everyone you meet.
7.0–7.9 Good Buy one and recommend it to your friends.
6.0–6.9 Pleasant Solid, super glad I drank it.
5.0–5.9 Average Totally acceptable.
4.0–4.9 Drinkable Not vocally complaining.
3.0–3.9 Poor Wish I was drinking something else.
2.0–2.9 Very poor Nothing nice to say.
1.0–1.9 Unpleasant No, that's not for me.
0.1–0.9 Inedible Pour it out.
` between two key/value pairs terminates the expression and Hugo fails the whole build with `unexpected "{" in operand`. Put notes here. `headerDeliveryCountry` feeds the aria-label of the destination picker under the express row (commerce/express-destination.js). The strip's visible text is rendered by Hugo itself in rx/price_block.html — nothing else needs seeding. */ -}}